Enzyme kinetics: full model

Deprecation warning

This website is now archived. Please check out the new website for Centre for Intelligent Systems which includes both A-Lab Control Systems Research lab and Re:creation XR lab.

However, the Dynamic System Model Database can still be used and may be updated in the future.

Arabidopsis Thaliana Model (1)

Model description: 

The model describes the first multi-gene loop identified in the Arabidopsis circadian clock that comprises a negative feedback loop, in which two partially redundant genes, Late Elongated Hypocotyl (LHY) and Circadian Clock Associated 1 (CCA1), repress the expression of their activator, Timing of CAB Expression 1 (TOC1). A minimal mathematical representation of the system requires 7 coupled differential equations and 29 parameters. The differential equations involve Michaelis-Menten kinetics that describe enzyme-mediated protein degradation, and Hill functions that describe some transcriptional activation terms. The model is given by:

$$\begin{align*} \dot{x}_1 &= n_1 \dfrac{x_6}{g_1+x_6} - m_1 \dfrac{x_1}{k_1 + x_1} + q_1x_7u(t),\\ \dot{x}_2 &= p_1x_1 - r_1x_2 + r_2x_3 - m_2 \dfrac{x_2}{k_2 + x_2},\\ \dot{x}_3 &= r_1x_2 - r_2x_3 - m_3 \dfrac{x_3}{k_3 + x_3},\\ \dot{x}_4 &= n_2\dfrac{g_2^2}{x_2^2+x_3^2} - m_4 \dfrac{x_4}{k_4 + x_4},\\ \dot{x}_5 &= p_2x_4 - r_3x_5 + r_4x_6 - m_5 \dfrac{x_5}{k_5 + x_5},\\ \dot{x}_6 &= r_3x_5 - r_4x_6 - m_6 \dfrac{x_6}{k_6 + x_6},\\ \dot{x}_7 &= p_3 - m_7 \dfrac{x_7}{k_7 + x_7} - (p_3 + q_2x_7)u(t) \end{align*}$$

with $x_i(0)=0, i=1,...,7$.

Type: 

Form: 

Model order: 

7

Time domain: 

Linearity: 

Publication details: 

TitleStructural Identifiability of Systems Biology Models: A Critical Comparison of Methods
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2011
AuthorsChis, Oana-Teodora, Banga Julio R., and Balsa-Canto Eva
Secondary AuthorsJaeger, JohannesEditor
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume6
Start Page1
Issue11
Pagination1-16
Date Published10/2011
ISSN1932-6203
AbstractAnalysing the properties of a biological system through in silico experimentation requires a satisfactory mathematical representation of the system including accurate values of the model parameters. Fortunately, modern experimental techniques allow obtaining time-series data of appropriate quality which may then be used to estimate unknown parameters. However, in many cases, a subset of those parameters may not be uniquely estimated, independently of the experimental data available or the numerical techniques used for estimation. This lack of identifiability is related to the structure of the model, i.e. the system dynamics plus the observation function. Despite the interest in knowing a priori whether there is any chance of uniquely estimating all model unknown parameters, the structural identifiability analysis for general non-linear dynamic models is still an open question. There is no method amenable to every model, thus at some point we have to face the selection of one of the possibilities. This work presents a critical comparison of the currently available techniques. To this end, we perform the structural identifiability analysis of a collection of biological models. The results reveal that the generating series approach, in combination with identifiability tableaus, offers the most advantageous compromise among range of applicability, computational complexity and information provided.
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0027755

Biochemical Reaction Network

Model description: 

The system, that could describe a biochemical reaction network, is represented by twenty differential equations, twenty two parameters, and all the states are assumed to be measured:

$$\begin{align*} \dot{x}_1&=-\dfrac{v_{max}x_1}{(k_m+x_1)}-p_1x_1 + u(t),\\ \dot{x}_{2}&=p_{1}x_{1}-p_{2}x_{2},\\ \dot{x}_{3}&=p_{2}x_{2}-p_{3}x_{3},\\ \dot{x}_{4}&=p_{3}x_{3}-p_{4}x_{4},\\ \dot{x}_{5}&=p_{4}x_{4}-p_{5}x_{5},\\ \dot{x}_{6}&=p_{5}x_{5}-p_{6}x_{6},\\ \dot{x}_{7}&=p_{6}x_{6}-p_{7}x_{7},\\ \dot{x}_{8}&=p_{7}x_{7}-p_{8}x_{8},\\ \dot{x}_{9}&=p_{8}x_{8}-p_{9}x_{9},\\ \dot{x}_{10}&=p_{9}x_{9}-p_{10}x_{10},\\ \dot{x}_{11}&=p_{10}x_{10}-p_{11}x_{11},\\ \dot{x}_{12}&=p_{11}x_{11}-p_{12}x_{12},\\ \dot{x}_{13}&=p_{12}x_{12}-p_{13}x_{13},\\ \dot{x}_{14}&=p_{13}x_{13}-p_{14}x_{14},\\ \dot{x}_{15}&=p_{14}x_{14}-p_{15}x_{15},\\ \dot{x}_{16}&=p_{15}x_{15}-p_{16}x_{16},\\ \dot{x}_{17}&=p_{16}x_{16}-p_{17}x_{17},\\ \dot{x}_{18}&=p_{17}x_{17}-p_{18}x_{18},\\ \dot{x}_{19}&=p_{18}x_{18}-p_{19}x_{19},\\ \dot{x}_{20}&=p_{19}x_{19}-p_{20}x_{20},\\ \end{align*}$$

where $x_i, i = 1, …, 20$ are the states. The unknown parameters are $p_i, i = 1, …, 20$, plus the two Michaelis-Menten parameters $ν_{max}$ and $k_m$. All the states are assumed to be measured.

Type: 

Form: 

Model order: 

20

Time domain: 

Linearity: 

Publication details: 

TitleStructural Identifiability of Systems Biology Models: A Critical Comparison of Methods
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2011
AuthorsChis, Oana-Teodora, Banga Julio R., and Balsa-Canto Eva
Secondary AuthorsJaeger, JohannesEditor
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume6
Start Page1
Issue11
Pagination1-16
Date Published10/2011
ISSN1932-6203
AbstractAnalysing the properties of a biological system through in silico experimentation requires a satisfactory mathematical representation of the system including accurate values of the model parameters. Fortunately, modern experimental techniques allow obtaining time-series data of appropriate quality which may then be used to estimate unknown parameters. However, in many cases, a subset of those parameters may not be uniquely estimated, independently of the experimental data available or the numerical techniques used for estimation. This lack of identifiability is related to the structure of the model, i.e. the system dynamics plus the observation function. Despite the interest in knowing a priori whether there is any chance of uniquely estimating all model unknown parameters, the structural identifiability analysis for general non-linear dynamic models is still an open question. There is no method amenable to every model, thus at some point we have to face the selection of one of the possibilities. This work presents a critical comparison of the currently available techniques. To this end, we perform the structural identifiability analysis of a collection of biological models. The results reveal that the generating series approach, in combination with identifiability tableaus, offers the most advantageous compromise among range of applicability, computational complexity and information provided.
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0027755

Glycolysis Inspired Metabolic Pathway

Model description: 

This model represents a glycolysis inspired pathway (the upper part of the glycolysis) with different physiological constraints on enzyme synthesis as described in Bartl et al.. A specific enzyme, here denoted by $u$, usually catalyses a metabolic reaction, expressed in terms of the stoichiometric matrix and the metabolites, here denoted by $x$: The dynamical model can be written as a system of differential equations:

$$\begin{align*} \dot{x}_1 &= - \dfrac{k_1x_1}{x_1+k_M}u_1 \\ \dot{x}_2 &= \dfrac{k_1x_1}{x_1+k_M}u_1 - \dfrac{k_2x_2}{x_2+k_M}u_2 \\ \dot{x}_3 &= \dfrac{k_2x_2}{x_2+k_M}u_2 - \dfrac{k_3x_3}{x_3+k_M}u_3 \\ \dot{x}_4 &= \dfrac{k_2x_2}{x_2+k_M}u_2 + \dfrac{k_3x_3}{x_3+k_M}u_3- \dfrac{k_4x_4}{x_4+k_M}u_4 \\ \dot{x}_5 &= \dfrac{k_4x_4}{x_4+k_M}u_4 \end{align*}$$

with $x_1(0)=S_1$, $x_2(0) = S_2$, $x_3(0) = S_3$, $x_4(0) = S_4$, $x_5(0)=S_5.$ The model is considered to be fully observable, i.e., $y_1=x_1$, $y_2=x_2$, $y_3=x_3$, $y_4=x_4$, $y_5=x_5$, and $u_1,u_2,u_3,u_4$ are independent variables.

Type: 

Form: 

Model order: 

5

Time domain: 

Linearity: 

Publication details: 

TitleStructural Identifiability of Systems Biology Models: A Critical Comparison of Methods
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2011
AuthorsChis, Oana-Teodora, Banga Julio R., and Balsa-Canto Eva
Secondary AuthorsJaeger, JohannesEditor
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume6
Start Page1
Issue11
Pagination1-16
Date Published10/2011
ISSN1932-6203
AbstractAnalysing the properties of a biological system through in silico experimentation requires a satisfactory mathematical representation of the system including accurate values of the model parameters. Fortunately, modern experimental techniques allow obtaining time-series data of appropriate quality which may then be used to estimate unknown parameters. However, in many cases, a subset of those parameters may not be uniquely estimated, independently of the experimental data available or the numerical techniques used for estimation. This lack of identifiability is related to the structure of the model, i.e. the system dynamics plus the observation function. Despite the interest in knowing a priori whether there is any chance of uniquely estimating all model unknown parameters, the structural identifiability analysis for general non-linear dynamic models is still an open question. There is no method amenable to every model, thus at some point we have to face the selection of one of the possibilities. This work presents a critical comparison of the currently available techniques. To this end, we perform the structural identifiability analysis of a collection of biological models. The results reveal that the generating series approach, in combination with identifiability tableaus, offers the most advantageous compromise among range of applicability, computational complexity and information provided.
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0027755

Pharmacokinetics model

Model description: 

The pharmacokinetics model is a two compartment model that embodies the ligands of the macrophage mannose receptor, and it is represented mathematically as a system of differential equations of the form:

$$\begin{align*} \dot{x}_1 &= \alpha_1(x_2-x_1) - \dfrac{k_av_mx_1}{k_ck_a+k_cx_3+k_ax_1},\\ \dot{x}_2 &= \alpha_2(x_1-x_2),\\ \dot{x}_3 &= \beta_1(x_4-x_3) - \dfrac{k_av_mx_3}{k_ck_a+k_cx_3+k_ax_1}, \\ \dot{x}_4 &= \beta_2(x_3-x_4), \end{align*}$$

where $x_1(0) = c_0$, $x_2(0)=0$, $x_3(0) = \gamma x_4(0)=0$, $x_1$ represents the enzyme concentration in plasma, $x_2$ its concentration in compartment, $x_3$ is the plasma concentration of the mannosylated polymer that acts as a competitor of glucose oxidase for the mannose receptor of macrophages, and $x_4$ is the concentration of the same competitor in the part of the extravascular fluid of the organs accessible to this macromolecule.

Type: 

Form: 

Model order: 

4

Time domain: 

Linearity: 

Publication details: 

TitleStructural Identifiability of Systems Biology Models: A Critical Comparison of Methods
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2011
AuthorsChis, Oana-Teodora, Banga Julio R., and Balsa-Canto Eva
Secondary AuthorsJaeger, JohannesEditor
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume6
Start Page1
Issue11
Pagination1-16
Date Published10/2011
ISSN1932-6203
AbstractAnalysing the properties of a biological system through in silico experimentation requires a satisfactory mathematical representation of the system including accurate values of the model parameters. Fortunately, modern experimental techniques allow obtaining time-series data of appropriate quality which may then be used to estimate unknown parameters. However, in many cases, a subset of those parameters may not be uniquely estimated, independently of the experimental data available or the numerical techniques used for estimation. This lack of identifiability is related to the structure of the model, i.e. the system dynamics plus the observation function. Despite the interest in knowing a priori whether there is any chance of uniquely estimating all model unknown parameters, the structural identifiability analysis for general non-linear dynamic models is still an open question. There is no method amenable to every model, thus at some point we have to face the selection of one of the possibilities. This work presents a critical comparison of the currently available techniques. To this end, we perform the structural identifiability analysis of a collection of biological models. The results reveal that the generating series approach, in combination with identifiability tableaus, offers the most advantageous compromise among range of applicability, computational complexity and information provided.
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0027755

Enzyme kinetics: full model

Model description: 

This is a full polynomial form of the model, given in Enzyme kinetics:

$$\begin{align*} \dot{x}_1 &= -bx_1 + ax_5\\ \dot{x}_2 &= \alpha x_1 - \beta x_2\\ \dot{x}_3 &= \gamma x_2 - \delta x_3\\ \dot{x}_4 &= \sigma x_4 x_6 ( \gamma x_2 - \delta x_3) \\ \dot{x}_5 &= -\sigma x_4 x_5^2 x_6 ( \gamma x_2 - \delta x_3)\\ \dot{x}_6 &= -x_6^2( \gamma x_2 - \delta x_3) \end{align*}$$

with $x_1(0) = 0.3617$, $x_2(0) = 0.9137$, $x_3(0)=1.3934$, $x_4(0) = x_3(0)^{\sigma}$, $x_5(0)=\dfrac{1}{A+x_3(0)^{\sigma}}$, $x_6(0)=\dfrac{1}{x_3(0)}.$

Type: 

Form: 

Model order: 

6

Time domain: 

Linearity: 

Publication details: 

TitleStructural Identifiability of Systems Biology Models: A Critical Comparison of Methods
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2011
AuthorsChis, Oana-Teodora, Banga Julio R., and Balsa-Canto Eva
Secondary AuthorsJaeger, JohannesEditor
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume6
Start Page1
Issue11
Pagination1-16
Date Published10/2011
ISSN1932-6203
AbstractAnalysing the properties of a biological system through in silico experimentation requires a satisfactory mathematical representation of the system including accurate values of the model parameters. Fortunately, modern experimental techniques allow obtaining time-series data of appropriate quality which may then be used to estimate unknown parameters. However, in many cases, a subset of those parameters may not be uniquely estimated, independently of the experimental data available or the numerical techniques used for estimation. This lack of identifiability is related to the structure of the model, i.e. the system dynamics plus the observation function. Despite the interest in knowing a priori whether there is any chance of uniquely estimating all model unknown parameters, the structural identifiability analysis for general non-linear dynamic models is still an open question. There is no method amenable to every model, thus at some point we have to face the selection of one of the possibilities. This work presents a critical comparison of the currently available techniques. To this end, we perform the structural identifiability analysis of a collection of biological models. The results reveal that the generating series approach, in combination with identifiability tableaus, offers the most advantageous compromise among range of applicability, computational complexity and information provided.
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0027755

Pages